Part III 阅读理解

Passage One

In today's world, many people are very worried about the environment, and make an effort to make "green" choices. Most of the world's big companies now try to demonstrate that they are eco-friendly, and use recyclable packaging and green marketing slogans to show this. However, beneath the surface there is a worrying trend, where companies pretend to be greener than they actually are. This is called greenwashing, and it's very important for consumers to be aware of the practice.

Greenwashing happens when people promote their products or policies as environmentally friendly, while in actual fact this is not the case. The word became popular in the 1980s when people first began to understand that the world's environment was under threat. Companies and governments began to showcase their so-called "eco-friendly" practices and policies, often exaggerating or making false claims to attract customers, improve their image, and increase their profits.

Greenwashing is not just about tricking consumers; it has much more serious consequences. In most situations, it is more expensive to make products using sustainable methods and materials, than to do so without bothering about sustainability. So, when companies make false claims about their environmental actions, they hurt real efforts towards sustainability and lessen the advantages of genuine green initiatives. This can confuse buyers and also take business away from companies that genuinely care about protecting the environment.

One famous example of greenwashing is the "Conscious Collection" marketed by one of the world's biggest clothing companies. According to the advertising, this collection is "a wonderful step towards meeting one of our main goals—to use only 100% recycled or other sustainably-sourced materials by 2030". Though this sounds like a very good intention—and indeed is a good intention—many critics argue that the fashion industry's overall business model of "fast fashion" leads to more consumerism, massive use of energy and natural resources, and waste. By concentrating their marketing on some of their collections that may indeed be genuinely eco-friendly, manufacturers divert attention away from their other collections that definitely are not eco-friendly.

As environmental challenges continue to grow, more people are trying to buy sustainable products and services. However, greenwashing makes this complicated, highlighting how important it is for consumers to take great care about what they buy. By understanding greenwashing and being thoughtful when we go shopping, we can promote a better world and support companies that genuinely aim for a greener future.

21. It is stated in Paragraph 1 that greenwashing ______.

    1. gives consumers greener choices.
    2. deserves consumers' attention.
    3. puts big companies into trouble.
    4. raises awareness of environmental protection.

    答案 B

    首段末句：消费者有必要了解漂绿这种做法。

22. The word "showcase" (Para.2) is closest in meaning to ______.

    1. exhibit
    2. publicize
    3. promote
    4. design

    答案 B

    showcase 指展示、宣传所谓的环保做法，与 publicize 最接近。

23. Which statement is NOT true about the consequences of greenwashing?

    1. It may increase the cost of eco-friendly products.
    2. Buyers may be confused by fake green products.
    3. Profits of genuine green companies may be affected.
    4. It may impair real efforts to make green products.

    答案 A

    文中说可持续生产本身更贵，并非漂绿推高了环保产品成本；A 与原文不符。

24. What can be learned about the "Conscious Collection"?

    1. It could be a milestone in the reform of the fashion industry.
    2. It forces the manufacturers to give up the old collection.
    3. It abandons the traditional business model of fast fashion.
    4. It tricks people into believing all their products are eco-friendly.

    答案 D

    用部分环保系列转移对其他非环保系列的注意。

25. The last paragraph indicates that ______.

    1. greenwashing drives people to buy eco-friendly products
    2. customers don't care whether the products are genuinely green
    3. people need to be careful in identifying real green products
    4. greenwashing makes contribution to environmental protection

    答案 C

    末段强调购物时要谨慎辨别。

Passage Two

Teach a chimpanzee (黑猩猩) to fish for insects to eat, and you feed her for a lifetime. Teach her a better way to use tools in gathering food, and you may change the course of evolution. For most wild chimpanzees, tool use is an important part of life—but learning these skills is no simple work.

"Non-human primates (灵长类) are often thought to learn tool skills by watching others and practicing on their own, with little direct help from mothers or other expert tool users," said Stephanie Musgrave, an assistant professor at the University of Miami. "In contrast, the results from research indicate that social learning may vary in relation to how challenging the task is: during tasks that are more difficult, mothers can, in fact, play a more active role, including behaviors that function to teach."

Researchers have been studying chimpanzee tool use for decades at the Gombe Stream Research Center. The Gombe chimpanzee study is one of the longest-running studies of animal behavior in the wild. The study is special because it applies research methods to directly compare how processes of cultural passing-on may differ between two populations of wild chimpanzees. In both populations, the chimpanzees use tools to target the same resource but the task varies in complexity.

Researchers examined the transfer of tools between chimpanzees during termite (白蚁) gathering and compared the populations in the Goualougo Triangle and Gombe. Termites are a valuable source of fat and protein in the diet of wild chimpanzees and also contribute important vitamins and minerals. Chimpanzees in both locations use fishing-probe style tools to harvest termites, but Goualougo chimpanzees use multiple, different types of tools one after another. At Goualougo, where the fishing tasks were more complex, the rate of tool transfer was three times higher than that at Gombe, and Goualougo mothers were more likely to transfer a tool in response to a request. Further, mothers at Goualougo most often responded to tool requests by actively giving a tool to offspring. Such active transfers were never observed at Gombe, where mothers most often responded by refusing to transfer tools.

26. Which statement is true about wild chimpanzees?

    1. They learn to use tools quickly.
    2. Tool use is difficult for them to learn.
    3. Humans should teach them how to fish.
    4. How they gather food was over there.

    答案 B

    首段：学会这些技能并不简单。

27. What is the main finding about non-human primates mentioned by Musgrave?

    1. They learn tool skills by practicing independently.
    2. Their social learning is not affected by task difficulty.
    3. They learn better while their mother is watching.
    4. Their mother may teach them more difficult tasks.

    答案 D

    任务更难时，母亲会更主动地发挥教学作用。

28. What is true about the Gombe chimpanzee study?

    1. It compares learning behaviors of two groups of chimpanzees.
    2. It focuses on study by chimpanzees' valuable food learning.
    3. It helps chimpanzees complete complex food fishing tasks.
    4. It is the first study in history of animal behavior.

    答案 A

    研究直接比较两群野生黑猩猩的文化传递。

29. Wild chimpanzees gather termites because ______.

    1. termites are their favorite food
    2. termites are a valuable source of nutrients
    3. this is the way they practice using tools
    4. this is the way they contribute to the family

    答案 B

    白蚁提供脂肪、蛋白质、维生素和矿物质。

30. In fishing tasks, Gombe mothers ______.

    1. refuse to pass a tool to their children
    2. show their children how to use tools
    3. respond to their children's request quickly
    4. offer several tools for their children to choose

    答案 A

    贡贝的母亲最常拒绝传递工具。

Passage Three

A decade ago humanity launched around 200 objects into space per year. Now we launch more than 2,600, with no prospects for slowing down. This rapid expansion of human activity in outer space has filled Earth orbit with space trash, from dead satellites to used-up rocket parts. The region is already so crowded that working satellites run the risk of colliding with bits of garbage from previous generations of spacecraft.

Currently there are more than 25,000 pieces of trackable human-made junk larger than 10 centimeters orbiting Earth. The more we put up there, the greater the chance that pieces of debris (碎片) will strike working spacecraft, creating even more dangerous trash. The catastrophic collision in 2009 between the defunct (停用的) Russian satellite Cosmos 2251 and the operational Iridium satellite, for example, generated nearly 2,000 debris fragments, many of which are still being tracked today.

Orbital space is a finite resource, and it's rapidly being consumed by a few organizations, notably SpaceX, OneWeb and Amazon's Project Kuiper. SpaceX, for instance, owns and operates the majority of all working satellites, and the company aims to launch tens of thousands more satellites to provide global broadband Internet coverage. Similarly, Amazon plans to deploy 3,236 satellites for its broadband network.

If we keep up this pace, orbital space will become unusable—especially the most popular region, low Earth orbit (LEO), which extends up to 2,000 kilometers in altitude. When looking at all orbital regions, we may lose services we've come to rely on: continuous communications, GPS mapping, Internet, Earth monitoring, and more. Today nearly every satellite that is launched is equivalent to a piece of single-use plastic, in that its fate is to become rubbish. We are heading toward a tragedy of the commons in orbital space: giving everyone unlimited access without global coordination and planning means that eventually no one may be able to use it.

As we continue to push the boundaries of space exploration and commercialization, there is a growing movement to rethink our approach to using the space environment—to move to a strategy anchored in responsibility and sound waste-management principles. Just as we are reckoning with how to conserve ecosystems on Earth for future living creatures, we must think of space as an environment worthy of preservation. In fact, reforming how we operate in space is critical for Earth conservation.

31. The theme of the passage is ______.

    1. The economic benefits of space exploration.
    2. The role of private companies in space exploration.
    3. The increasing danger of space debris.
    4. The history of satellite launches into space.

    答案 C

    全文围绕太空垃圾增多及其风险。

32. What event in 2009 resulted in nearly 2,000 debris fragments?

    1. The launch of a new satellite.
    2. The crash between two spacecraft.
    3. The collision between two satellites.
    4. The breakdown of a rocket.

    答案 C

    宇宙2251与铱星卫星相撞。

33. Why is SpaceX mentioned in the passage?

    1. It is the best known space company in the world.
    2. It provides worldwide broadband Internet coverage.
    3. It controls and manages most of the operational satellites.
    4. It aims to launch 3,236 satellites for its broadband network.

    答案 C

    SpaceX 拥有并运营着大多数在轨卫星；3236 颗是亚马逊的计划。

34. What is a possible reason that low Earth orbit may become unusable?

    1. Lack of demand for broadband Internet.
    2. The increasing number of satellites and space debris.
    3. The enormous size of the satellites in space.
    4. The high cost of launching satellites into space.

    答案 B

    卫星与碎片不断增加使低地球轨道过于拥挤。

35. What is essential for future space operations?

    1. Increasing the speed of satellite launches.
    2. Moving towards a more sustainable space use.
    3. Reducing the number of satellites.
    4. Expanding private companies' control over space.

    答案 B

    末段主张负责任、可持续的空间利用。

Passage Four

We often hear that 60 is the new 50, and 70 the new 60. It is a saying borne out by old photos. Just check out images of your grandparents or great-grandparents and notice their weak bodies, lined faces and how they seem anchored in their chairs when they were barely pushing 60—what a contrast with vigorous, gym-going 60s of today!

Recent studies comparing populations born in different decades have looked beyond these surface impressions to nail down actual physical and mental differences in the ways we are aging. They have identified particular areas of improvement. But these gains are not across the board, and they appear to depend on social, behavioral and economic factors.

Two studies from Finland—one focused on physical aging and the other on cognitive aging—strikingly demonstrate some of the details of generational change. The research, overseen by Taina Rantanen at the University of Jyväskylä, compared adults born in 1910 and 1914 with those born roughly 30 years later. The two age groups were assessed in 1989 and 1990 and in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The beauty of this work is that both birth groups were examined in person at age 75 and again at 80 with the same substantial battery of six physical tests and five measures of cognition. However, most other group studies look at a narrower range of measures, and many of them rely on self-assessments.

The later-born group could walk faster, had a stronger hand grip and could exert more force with their lower leg. Such metrics are reliable predictors of disability and mortality. On cognitive tests, the later group had better verbal fluency, clocked faster reaction time on a complex finger-movement task, and scored higher on a test matching numbers to symbols.

But not everything changed across the generations: measures of lung function were surprisingly static, and there was no improvement in the short-term-memory task of recalling a string of digits—possibly because rote memorization (机械记忆) has been de-emphasized in school and in daily life in recent decades, the researchers suspect.

There are many reasons that people are aging better, including improved medical care and a drop in smoking, but the factors that loomed largest in the Finnish study of physical function, lead author Kaisa Koivunen says, were that the later-born adults were more physically active and had bigger bodies, which suggests better nutrition. For brain function, the key seems to be more years of education. In both the Finnish and other studies, cognitive differences between the groups largely disappeared when researchers controlled for this factor.

36. What is the theme of the passage?

    1. The role of medical care in aging.
    2. Comparison of aging across generations.
    3. Importance of education in physical health.
    4. The decline in cognitive ability with age.

    答案 B

    全文比较不同世代的衰老差异。

37. What does the phrase "across the board" (Para.2) probably mean?

    1. In all areas
    2. For a specific group
    3. Between generations
    4. Out of question

    答案 A

    指改善并非在所有方面都出现。

38. Which was a finding from the Finnish studies comparing the two groups?

    1. Both groups showed improvement in cognitive functions.
    2. The later-born group scored higher in physical and cognitive tests.
    3. The earlier-born group performed better in cognitive tests.
    4. Both groups had similar results in almost all tests.

    答案 B

    后出生组在步行、握力及多项认知测试上更好。

39. What was one surprising result from the Finnish studies?

    1. There were no improvements in lung function.
    2. Short-term memory has strengthened greatly.
    3. The earlier-born group had stronger hand grips.
    4. The later-born group had poorer physical fitness.

    答案 A

    肺功能出人意料地没有变化。

40. What was a key factor in the cognitive differences between the two groups?

    1. Better medical care
    2. More physical activity
    3. Increased years of education
    4. Improvements in diet and nutrition

    答案 C

    控制受教育年限后，认知差异基本消失。

Blog and Comments

Past generations read books, watched movies or television—we surf. Are we happier after doing these actions? At least sometimes, right—why would we do them, otherwise?

Technology can make us happy in many ways. For example, technology can help us be more productive and creative, which could lead to a happier workplace. Technology can also help us stay connected with our loved ones, which could lead to a happier social life. Think about how we keep in touch with friends and family through social media or video calls, even when we're miles apart. Then there's entertainment, streaming movies, games, music, all at your fingertips. It also makes life easier by automating boring tasks, from smart home gadgets to apps that simplify our daily routines.

But it is certainly also true that technology does not make us happier at times. Too often I find myself reading blogs or tweets or using services that make me angry or frustrated or sad. It is not that I consciously went out to follow these downers, it just happened—like seeing a bad movie. It's an odd idea: why do people follow others that make them upset? But it's a behavior I see a lot—especially on sites like Twitter and Facebook.

41. Which is not mentioned as the benefits of technology?

    1. Technology saves effort.
    2. Technology entertains us.
    3. Technology teaches us something new.
    4. Technology facilitates social interaction.

    答案 D

    按所给答案：D 未被当作文中列出的益处。

42. The author would probably agree that ______.

    1. reading on the Internet is frustrating.
    2. it's hard to guarantee online service quality.
    3. websites should be blamed for unhappiness.
    4. depressing news draws a lot of attention.

    答案 D

    作者观察到很多人会关注让自己难过的内容。

43. The "growing ego" in comment 1 probably means ______.

    1. bonding with others
    2. selfishness
    3. neglect of the outside world
    4. pursuit of happiness

    答案 B

    评论1指越来越关注自己，即自私。

44. Which comment implies that happiness has nothing to do with technology?

    1. Comment 1
    2. Comment 2
    3. Comment 3
    4. Comment 4

    答案 B

    评论2认为若让科技定义幸福就没抓住要点。

45. Which comments stress the importance of social interaction?

    1. Comment 1 and 2
    2. Comment 1 and 3
    3. Comment 2 and 4
    4. Comment 3 and 4

    答案 C

    按试卷标注答案为评论2与4。